Forum Jump:


Dogs 65 - Clemson 13..................no dabo dance on Kirby's watch
#1
Reply
#2
I’m with ya Python..game won’t be close.  Dabo’s inability to accept the portal catches up with him.  We have a special team this year and everyone given the chance to play will shine.
Reply
#3
(08-12-2024, 05:33 PM)Replying to Punkin14

I have to admit the purist in me likes his position on the portal but the realist knows he is hamstringing the rock petter program.

He has recruited pretty well but he doesn't have that generational talent at qb and his coordinators aren't close to what they were in their early CFP run.  I think it is close for a half, maybe even into the third, but dawgs are too deep and too talented for the tiggers to hang for 60 minutes.  Line is currently Georgia -13.5.  I think we cover late after a close half to three quarters.
Reply
#4
Dawgs 49-0. Right ON!!!!!
Reply
#5
I got some tickets way up Tow Row. $124 almost $200 after all fees. Dang I must Love Them Dawgs!

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ0YF9ZCUc43VLTNr5c_43...I&usqp=CAU]

Georgia vs Clemson All Time 43–18–4

9 of those Clemson wins came before 1914. 

They won 7 in a row from 1900 to 1906.

We won 10 in a row 1920 to 1954.

We went 9-0-1 from 1962 to 1973.

We were dead even 7-7-1 from 1974 to 1990.

We are 7-1 since 1991 Garrison Hearst and Eric Zeier (Braves won 1st Playoff Game).
[Image: iOvLDN1.jpg?1] [Image: 1VWtPlw.jpg?1] [Image: CK0zHIu.jpg] [Image: yTj6tPw.jpg?1] [Image: Nhc7kqD.jpg?1] [Image: J3gH23f.jpg?1] 
.
[Image: XL6hRLC.jpg?1] [Image: 5sF0KCy.jpg] [Image: Krtkq7L.jpg?2] [Image: zhgbCrH.jpg?1]
Reply
#6
Cool, im in sec 119 row 32.
Reply
#7
Dawgs 38 - Tiggers 13 is my guess.
Reply
#8
Clemson dominated us 120 years ago. Smile
Cool
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)

Playwire

Advertise on this site.

HairoftheDawg.net is an independent website and is not affiliated with The University of Georgia. © 2024 HairoftheDawg.net All rights reserved
NOTE: The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of HairoftheDawg.net.