Forum Jump:


Toasty Bits
#1
Hearing we gone see more of London Humphrey at both Z and X against fBama.  Rusty and Natty's guy said we gone move Bell around to get more favorable match ups. Slot motion and routes out of the backfield.  He'll take reps from Bell and Young at X.  Not sure about Z.

The Jake chimed in on A. Evans. ....he heard reason we haven't seen him in at WR games yet is he doesn’t catch consistently in practice.

I suppose JHump16 will take reps from Smiff at Z.  As well Bell.

(Yesterday, 09:39 AM)Replying to Toasty B

LHump16
Reply
#2
I certainly hope for the sake of this year that London learns to block because that kid from Stainford wanted nothing to do with it.
Reply
#3
(Yesterday, 10:00 AM)Replying to FeralDawg

LHump16 would be doing RosemyJS type blocks...not Yoursuck.  Also A Smith types block (he's been called twice this year for illegal blocks)
Reply
#4
That's good news. We need another McConkey in there.
Reply
#5
(Yesterday, 10:33 AM)Replying to kdsdawg

Not quite the same.  McKonkey was never a X WR.  He played Z and Y.  Humphries we do some similar stuff as Ladd at the Z,  However iom, we need more X WRs especially with the loss of RaRA and Bell is more of a Z.  We've been playing Bell or Young at X.  Young will continue to run at X or some of the Bowers routes from WR instead of TE.  Bell will be doing more Z and maybe RB routes out of the backfield.
Reply
#6
(Yesterday, 10:52 AM)Replying to Toasty B

Not quite the same.  McKonkey was never a X WR.  He played Z and Y.  Humphries we do some similar stuff as Ladd at the Z,  However iom, we need more X WRs especially with the loss of RaRA and Bell is more of a Z.  We've been playing Bell or Young at X.  Young will continue to run at X or some of the Bowers routes from WR instead of TE.  Bell will be doing more Z and maybe RB routes out of the backfield.
[/quote]

lmao, you weight 165 pounds, barely can see over your car roof when unlocking the door and suddenly have become a football expert never having suited up a day in your life post 6 years of age. Comical. Sad.
Reply
#7
Not sure I like a guy returning punts that doesn't catch consistently
[Image: ABLVV863V9WFg8RK4p1_hEqFPtGo9IsoEH_NHJgU...authuser=0]
Reply
#8
(Yesterday, 04:24 PM)Replying to 690 S Lumpkin

Not quite the same.  McKonkey was never a X WR.  He played Z and Y.  Humphries we do some similar stuff as Ladd at the Z,  However iom, we need more X WRs especially with the loss of RaRA and Bell is more of a Z.  We've been playing Bell or Young at X.  Young will continue to run at X or some of the Bowers routes from WR instead of TE.  Bell will be doing more Z and maybe RB routes out of the backfield.
[/quote]

lmao, you weight 165 pounds, barely can see over your car roof when unlocking the door and suddenly have become a football expert never having suited up a day in your life post 6 years of age. Comical. Sad.
[/quote]
165 I wish. Was starting fullback for the varsity for two years. Ask jet dog.
Reply
#9
Bobo is very excited about all the screen passes he can throw to the WRs.
Reply
#10
Thanks ToastyB
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)

Playwire

Advertise on this site.

HairoftheDawg.net is an independent website and is not affiliated with The University of Georgia. © 2024 HairoftheDawg.net All rights reserved
NOTE: The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of HairoftheDawg.net.