Forum Jump:


Yer take?
#1
https://x.com/BrentRollinsPhD/status/184...1_&ref_url=
Reply
#2
Pretty good hops
Reply
#3
(Yesterday, 09:51 AM)Replying to Tomato Sandwich

you like illegal hops, do ya, Mater?
Reply
#4
(Yesterday, 09:51 AM)Replying to Toasty B

you like illegal hops, do ya, Mater?
[/quote]

Who the fuck cares?  Games over. Dawgs won. You could dissect every game ever played and find plenty of penalties that weren't called, but that would make you a whinny bitch. Time to move on. Fuck Florida.
Reply
#5
(Yesterday, 09:54 AM)Replying to Tomato Sandwich

you like illegal hops, do ya, Mater?
[/quote]

Who the fuck cares?  Games over. Dawgs won. You could dissect every game ever played and find plenty of penalties that weren't called, but that would make you a whinny bitch. Time to move on. Fuck Florida.
[/quote]
BUT for that to happen on THAT play....cra play
Reply
#6
If it had been called the Texas fans would have thrown stuff on the field and the SEC refs would have overturned the call. Vegas had put the call in to tighten that game up and the refs, the SEC and Mickey weren't going to piss off Vito and Tony.
Reply
#7
(Yesterday, 10:03 AM)Replying to JC-DAWG83

I don't follow....UGA covered by 19.5 points.  Were they working the over/under to under?

(Yesterday, 10:27 AM)Replying to Toasty B

I don't follow....UGA covered by 19.5 points.  Were they working the over/under to under?
[/quote]

and it was on the same play that they threw shit on the field so that would have been a wash.
Reply
#8
(Yesterday, 10:27 AM)Replying to Toasty B

I don't follow....UGA covered by 19.5 points.  Were they working the over/under to under?

(Yesterday, 10:27 AM)Replying to Toasty B

I don't follow....UGA covered by 19.5 points.  Were they working the over/under to under?
[/quote]

and it was on the same play that they threw shit on the field so that would have been a wash.
[/quote]
You're not wrong, I just don't fucking care. Win and move on
Reply
#9
(Yesterday, 11:49 AM)Replying to Tomato Sandwich

I don't follow....UGA covered by 19.5 points.  Were they working the over/under to under?

(Yesterday, 10:27 AM)Replying to Toasty B

I don't follow....UGA covered by 19.5 points.  Were they working the over/under to under?
[/quote]

and it was on the same play that they threw shit on the field so that would have been a wash.
[/quote]
You're not wrong, I just don't fucking care. Win and move on
[/quote]

(Yesterday, 11:49 AM)Replying to Tomato Sandwich

I don't follow....UGA covered by 19.5 points.  Were they working the over/under to under?

(Yesterday, 10:27 AM)Replying to Toasty B

I don't follow....UGA covered by 19.5 points.  Were they working the over/under to under?
[/quote]

and it was on the same play that they threw shit on the field so that would have been a wash.
[/quote]
You're not wrong, I just don't fucking care. Win and move on
[/quote]
Reply
#10
So a runner can jump a tackler, but a D player can’t jump a blocker? Asking for a friend..
Cool
Reply
#11
(Yesterday, 12:40 PM)Replying to McDonoughDawg

He can BUT he can't land on him
Reply
#12
refs win .
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)

Playwire

Advertise on this site.

HairoftheDawg.net is an independent website and is not affiliated with The University of Georgia. © 2024 HairoftheDawg.net All rights reserved
NOTE: The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of HairoftheDawg.net.