No bigger non call this year than the possible targeting

[kdsdawg]

on that hit by Dan Jackson that caused the fumble. Not even sure how it wasn't mentioned on the broadcast last night and it was reviewed. Must have been another angle they had to ignore it. 


https://x.com/ijordanmoore/status/186270...wE2ZcrzH3w

[jmac]

I was 100% sure they were gonna call it after the review

[kdsdawg]

That is what shocked me the most after that long break while the review went on.

[Top Row Dawg]

Wasn't helmet to helmet maybe. Kinda makes it sweeter, they owed us one Jasper Sanks. They missed a PI on one of them overtimes but gave us one on our last regulation drive.

[DawgWood]

Agreed. When I saw the replay, I said "oh shit, we're hosed"

[Top Row Dawg]

We got a controversial PI in that 97 picked our hearts up game with Bobo as QB. Still don't make me feel better bout the Sanks call.

[McDonoughDawg]

He targeted the football…and Beck on that last drive, money..

[musiccitydawg]

I thought the same. But it appears that initial contact was with the ball. Anything after that was incidental. That was a good non-call. The point of the targeting rule is to prevent intentional/unnecessary injuries. Every defensive player at every level of football is taught to put their helmet on the ball in a situation like that to force a TO. Brushing the facemask after the first contact would be a BS ticky-tack call. You could call that on half the tackles made at the LOS.