Posts: 244
Threads: 84
Joined: Dec 2023
on that hit by Dan Jackson that caused the fumble. Not even sure how it wasn't mentioned on the broadcast last night and it was reviewed. Must have been another angle they had to ignore it.
https://x.com/ijordanmoore/status/186270...wE2ZcrzH3w
Posts: 108
Threads: 8
Joined: Dec 2023
I was 100% sure they were gonna call it after the review
Posts: 244
Threads: 84
Joined: Dec 2023
That is what shocked me the most after that long break while the review went on.
Posts: 1,689
Threads: 1,057
Joined: Dec 2023
Wasn't helmet to helmet maybe. Kinda makes it sweeter, they owed us one Jasper Sanks. They missed a PI on one of them overtimes but gave us one on our last regulation drive.
Posts: 577
Threads: 184
Joined: Dec 2023
Agreed. When I saw the replay, I said "oh shit, we're hosed"
Posts: 1,689
Threads: 1,057
Joined: Dec 2023
11-30-2024, 10:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-30-2024, 10:17 AM by Top Row Dawg.)
We got a controversial PI in that 97 picked our hearts up game with Bobo as QB. Still don't make me feel better bout the Sanks call.
Posts: 1,693
Threads: 150
Joined: Dec 2023
11-30-2024, 10:25 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-30-2024, 10:25 AM by McDonoughDawg.)
He targeted the football…and Beck on that last drive, money..
Posts: 180
Threads: 110
Joined: Dec 2023
I thought the same. But it appears that initial contact was with the ball. Anything after that was incidental. That was a good non-call. The point of the targeting rule is to prevent intentional/unnecessary injuries. Every defensive player at every level of football is taught to put their helmet on the ball in a situation like that to force a TO. Brushing the facemask after the first contact would be a BS ticky-tack call. You could call that on half the tackles made at the LOS.